Prescription for Disaster

Video Series: The Impact of ObamaCare - Part 5

Friday, March 09, 2012
Dr. Jill Vecchio, a Colorado physician, has produced a seven-part video series about the impact of ObamaCare. The videos include the following subjects: (Part 1) who will be covered; (Parts 2 and 3) what are the costs; (Part 4) state exchanges and employers; (Part 5) doctors and patients; (Part 6) Constitutional issues; and (Part 7) ideas for real healthcare reform.

The videos are certainly worth watching and we hope you will take the time to learn more about how ObamaCare will affect you and your family:


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Video Series: The Impact of ObamaCare - Part 4

Thursday, March 08, 2012
Dr. Jill Vecchio, a Colorado physician, has produced a seven-part video series about the impact of ObamaCare. The videos include the following subjects: (Part 1) who will be covered; (Parts 2 and 3) what are the costs; (Part 4) state exchanges and employers; (Part 5) doctors and patients; (Part 6) Constitutional issues; and (Part 7) ideas for real healthcare reform.

The videos are certainly worth watching and we hope you will take the time to learn more about how ObamaCare will affect you and your family:


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

Video Series: The Impact of ObamaCare - Part 3

Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Dr. Jill Vecchio, a Colorado physician, has produced a seven-part video series about the impact of ObamaCare. The videos include the following subjects: (Part 1) who will be covered; (Parts 2 and 3) what are the costs; (Part 4) state exchanges and employers; (Part 5) doctors and patients; (Part 6) Constitutional issues; and (Part 7) ideas for real healthcare reform.

The videos are certainly worth watching and we hope you will take the time to learn more about how ObamaCare will affect you and your family:


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

Democrat Admits Obama Administration is Ignoring Constitution

Wednesday, March 07, 2012
Democratic U.S. Representative Kathy Hochul (NY-26) admitted to her constituents that the Obama Administration was "not looking at" the Constitution when it created the contraception mandate.

 

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Indiana Senate Rejects Health Care Compact Medicare Takeover

Tuesday, March 06, 2012
According to the NWITimes.com, the Indiana Senate has stripped out the state's takeover of Medicare as part of the ill-advised legislation to create a Health Care Compact. Under the compact, states are purportedly given control over health care policy in their state and are required to completely (and dangerously) remake the health care system in their state. (As AHEC has previously pointed out, the compact's promises are completely false).

The compact seeks to give state federal money to finance programs that states would be responsible to create. In doing so, the compact ends Medicare in each state that adopts the compact. Indiana stands to lose $56 billion in federal health care funding over the coming decade. 

The silliness of the advocates of the compact - principally the Health Care Compact Alliance led by Leo Linbeck III - would have the states first enter into the compact which requires them to remake their state's health care system while deferring the difficult policy decisions to a later date. Linbeck's idea sounds eerily similar to Nancy Pelosi's comment that Congress had to "pass the bill so you can find out what's in it." It is as if Linbeck was telling states, including Indiana, that they had to "pass the compact so Indiana legislators, patients and doctors can find out what health care will look under the compact."

AHEC applauds the effort of the state legislators to protect Medicare but it would be better if they outright killed the compact altogether.

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Video Series: The Impact of ObamaCare - Part 2

Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Dr. Jill Vecchio, a Colorado physician, has produced a seven-part video series about the impact of ObamaCare. The videos include the following subjects: (Part 1) who will be covered; (Parts 2 and 3) what are the costs; (Part 4) state exchanges and employers; (Part 5) doctors and patients; (Part 6) Constitutional issues; and (Part 7) ideas for real healthcare reform.

The videos are certainly worth watching and we hope you will take the time to learn more about how ObamaCare will affect you and your family:


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

What We Know About ObamaCare

Tuesday, March 06, 2012

Last week, the House Ways and Means Committee sent out a press release detailing what we know about ObamaCare so far. This is by no means an exhaustive list of the negative consequences of the health care law but it sure is enlightening reading. Here is what WAM sent out:

  • Health care costs for consumers and health care spending overall will increase drastically as a result of the Democrats’ health care law.
  • 72 percent of Americans expect the Democrats’ health care law won’t make their families' health care situation better.
  • Despite promises of lower costs that were repeated over and over by the President and other supporters, 75 percent of small businesses that offer health insurance to their employees do not believe the law will slow the rise in health care costs. 
  • Health care premiums will continue to go up, not down, despite President Obama’s promise to reduce health care premiums by $2,500. A Kaiser Family Foundation report found that health care premiums in the workplace increased 9 percent, or over $1,200, for an average American family in the year following enactment of the Democrats’ health care law.
  • Employers are dropping coverage due to the health care law, destroying the ability to “keep the coverage you have and like.” Another report from the McKinsey Group found that more than 50 percent of employers with a high awareness of the law say they will stop offering health coverage. 
  • The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that the health care law may hinder job creation. Additionally, in a 2011 letter to Congress, 200 economists wrote that the law “contains expensive mandates and penalties that create major barriers to stronger job growth.” 
  • Americans of all political stripes believe the requirement to purchase government-mandated health insurance even if they can’t afford it, the centerpiece of the Democrats’ health care law, is unconstitutional. In a recent Gallup poll, 72 percent of Americans said that this provision is unconstitutional, with over 50 percent of Democrats agreeing. 
  • As a result of the Democrats’ health care law, more than 90 percent of seniors will lose the retiree prescription drug coverage they have and like and see nearly double-digit premium increases. 
  • The Obama Administration continues to overpromise, overspend and underperform – all at the expense of the taxpayer. Consider these three examples:
  • Despite a $5 billion price tag, the high-risk pool that was intended to cover 375,000 people has only 45,000 enrollees. 
  • The Obama Administration handed out more than one-half billion dollars in cut-rate loans, primarily to political allies to form cooperatives, many of whom do not appear eligible under the law. 
  • The Administration has already nearly exhausted $5 billion in funds for the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP), which was supposed to be in place through 2014. By refusing to pay new claims, this is yet another broken promise in the Democrats’ law. However, the Obama Administration did not miss the opportunity to reward its politically favored friends – unions and state and local governments – which comprised about half of the entities receiving the federal retiree reinsurance subsidies.
Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

Video Series: The Impact of ObamaCare - Part 1

Monday, March 05, 2012
Dr. Jill Vecchio, a Colorado physician, has produced a seven-part video series about the impact of ObamaCare. The videos include the following subjects: (Part 1) who will be covered; (Parts 2 and 3) what are the costs; (Part 4) state exchanges and employers; (Part 5) doctors and patients; (Part 6) Constitutional issues; and (Part 7) ideas for real healthcare reform.

The videos are certainly worth watching and we hope you will take the time to learn more about how ObamaCare will affect you and your family:

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

Sebelius Throws DOJ Under the Bus

Friday, March 02, 2012
Okay - DOJ has repeatedly argued that the individual mandate is a tax to fend off legal challenges about the constitutionality of the mandate and ObamaCare as a whole. This gives them the "hook" to claim the law is constitutional because it is based on Congress' taxing powers. The law itself, however, states it is not a tax.

At any rate, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius threw DOJ under the bus in testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee the other day when she said that the mandate was "not a tax per se."


Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC


Bookmark and Share

Obama Administration Funding Radical Groups with ObamaCare Funds

Friday, March 02, 2012
FoxNews is reporting that the Obama Administration is funneling millions of dollars of ObamaCare money to liberal groups - including $56 million to a group with historic ties to radical leftist Saul Alinsky. The group, Common Ground Healthcare Cooperative, was given $56 million in taxpayer dollars to set up a non-profit health insurer over the next five years.

AHEC has the following commentary about the propriety of forcing taxpayers to finance this kind of government endeavor:

(1) This kind of endeavor should be financed through private philanthropy, not government coercion through taxation? In August 2010, an article was published at A Line of Sight that made the following comment: "Charities play a vital role in society, but the appropriate way to fund these charitable activities is through the individual generosity of the American people. American taxpayers should not be forced to finance charities they do not support." That is exactly what is being done here - taxpayers are forced to pay taxes so the Obama Administration can reward its friends. If there was real support for this endeavor, let private individuals fund the charity but don't force taxpayers to do this.

(2) This is similar to the manner in which the Obama Administration has funded its friends in the energy field. Will this end up to by Solyndra-care where taxpayers take the financial brunt of a completely failed exercise? Government has a track record of spectacular failures when finding enterprises like this.
 
(3) This should be offensive from the perspective of many taxpayers. Consider that people who work for an insurance company or have invested in one, are forced to pay higher taxes under ObamaCare in order to fund a non-profit that will comet with them but the playing field is not level. The non-profit does not have to earn more money in order to pay taxes like the for-profit insurance company does. That is totally unfair. Government has used coercion to pick winners and losers once again.
 

Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC

Bookmark and Share

 
AHEC on Facebook AHEC on Twitter AHEC on Twitter

Recent Posts


Tags


Archive