ObamaCare Threatens the Poor, Most Vulnerable Among Us
New Senate Report Details Side Effects of ObamaCare
U.S. Senators Dr. Tom Coburn, MD (R-OK) and Dr. John Barrasso, MD (R-WY) have released a new report examining the impact and consequences of ObamaCare Their report titled, “Warning: Side Effects, A Check-Up on the Federal Health Law”, is frightening as the Senator/Doctors details the consequences of this law.
Drs. Coburn and Barrasso report states: “Over the past twenty four months, American families have learned more about the President’s health care law and do not like what they see. Higher insurance premiums. A coming state budget-busting Medicaid expansion. Fewer choices. Less freedom and more government interference. Cuts to Medicare by unelected government bureaucrats. Thousands of pages of regulations. An unconstitutional mandate to buy health insurance. Penalties on employers threatening job creation. Billions of dollars in tax hikes and, once fully implemented, $2.6 trillion in new health care spending.”
Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC
HHS Issues Exchange Regulations
- No clarity on what benefit mandates will be imposed on states
- No clarity on cost-sharing
- No clarity on risk adjustment and reinsurance
- No clarity on the federal health insurance exchange that would be forced upon states if they refuse to implement the law
- No clarity regarding who will pay for a federal health insurance exchange
- No clarity on “partnership exchanges”
HHS Issues Exchange Regulations
- No clarity on what benefit mandates will be imposed on states
- No clarity on cost-sharing
- No clarity on risk adjustment and reinsurance
- No clarity on the federal health insurance exchange that would be forced upon states if they refuse to implement the law
- No clarity regarding who will pay for a federal health insurance exchange
- No clarity on “partnership exchanges”
HHS Issues Exchange Regulations
- No clarity on what benefit mandates will be imposed on states
- No clarity on cost-sharing
- No clarity on risk adjustment and reinsurance
- No clarity on the federal health insurance exchange that would be forced upon states if they refuse to implement the law
- No clarity regarding who will pay for a federal health insurance exchange
- No clarity on “partnership exchanges”
ObamaCare Tramples on Religious Liberty, Ignores Conscience Clause
Lawsuits, Repeal Votes, Public Opposition - ObamaCare's Really Bad Year
Et Tu Barack, Like Caesar Berwick Done in by His Own (And the Weight of ObamaCare)
Outgoing CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, someone who once romanced rationing, is stepping down from his post. While some in the media may portray him as a martyr given his inability to obtain Senate confirmation to the post, Avik Roy puts the situation in proper perspective. Roy states that contrary to MSM myth that Berwick was "done in by Republican intransigence. He was done in by presidential cowardice. And therein lies a microcosm of everything that’s been wrong with Obamacare."
Read Roy's full article at National Review Online, here.
Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.
American Spectator: Obama's Election Strategy - Silence on ObamaCare
Grace-Marie Turner writes for the American Spectator that Obama has a new election strategy to deal with the issue of ObamaCare - silence. Read her full article here.
Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.
Unelected Board Can Impose Medicare Cuts - Even Over Congress' Objection
Kevin Mooney of The Pelican Post has written an exceptional article explaining how ObamaCare creates IPAB, an unelected board of bureaucrats, who will have the power to impose health care cuts and effectively ration care. Most troubling about IPAB is that their decisions cannot be overturned by a majority in Congress. Mooney provides about a lawsuit in Arizona, brought by the Goldwater Institute, challenging IPAB's constitutionality because "IPAB has unprecedented authority to make public policy without any meaningful oversight from the legislative, judicial or executive branches of government, according to the suit."
Diane Cohen, of Goldwater, states: "IPAB has unprecedented authority to make public policy without any meaningful oversight from the legislative, judicial or executive branches of government, according to the suit."
As Docs4PatientCare has noted, IPAB is one avenue by which ObamaCare moves the United States towards socialized medicine where government will be able to ration care. In Britain, doctors are instructed to ration life-saving, early detection cancer screenings to save money.
Be sure to follow AHEC on Twitter @TheAHEC and at Facebook.com/TheAHEC.
Recent Posts
- House Questions Obama Admin For Using Taxpayer Money to Push ObamaCare
- Government Can Lead by Getting Out of the Way
- ObamaCare's Job Killing Tax on Innovation
- How The Sale of Insurance Across State Lines Would Work
- The Coming Government Price Controls Under ObamaCare
- The Future of Health Care Innovation
- The Future of Health Care Innovation
- Calls Grow Louder for Montana to Reject ObamaCare Exchanges
- ObamaCare Threatens the Poor, Most Vulnerable Among Us
- Just in Time for the Election, HHS Releases ObamaCare Propaganda
Tags
- AAA (3)
- Abortion (18)
- Alabama (81)
- Alaska (82)
- Arizona (84)
- Arkansas (74)
- Bureaucracy (9)
- California (81)
- CHIP (Children’s Health) (7)
- CLASS Act (13)
- Colorado (78)
- Compacts (20)
- Comparison to other nations (3)
- Congressional Budget Office (47)
- Congressional Oversight (58)
- Connecticut (68)
- DC (67)
- Delaware (68)
- Elena Kagen (10)
- Exchanges (18)
- Expanded Bureaucracy (36)
- Federal Budget Impact (52)
- Federal Spending (36)
- Florida (90)
- Free Market (35)
- Georgia (79)
- Hawaii (67)
- HHS (39)
- HSAs (12)
- Idaho (77)
- Illinois (70)
- Impact on Consumers (89)
- In the States (59)
- Indiana (80)
- Individual Mandate (58)
- Innovation (9)
- Iowa (73)
- IPAB (10)
- Kansas (78)
- Kentucky (71)
- Lawsuits (64)
- Losing Coverage (38)
- Louisiana (81)
- Maine (77)
- Maryland (69)
- Massachusetts (76)
- Media (8)
- Medicaid (65)
- Medicare (71)
- Michigan (90)
- Mini-Med Plans (10)
- Minnesota (70)
- Mississippi (77)
- Missouri (76)
- Montana (72)
- Nebraska (79)
- Nevada (80)
- New Hampshire (72)
- New Jersey (72)
- New Mexico (69)
- New York (73)
- North Carolina (71)
- North Dakota (78)
- ObamaCare Implementation (245)
- Ohio (79)
- Oklahoma (84)
- Oregon (69)
- Pennsylvania (79)
- Polling/Public Opinion (19)
- Prescription Drugs (10)
- Price Controls (4)
- Rationing (5)
- Regulations (34)
- Repeal (54)
- Rhode Island (69)
- Seniors (19)
- Socialized Medicine (11)
- South Carolina (79)
- South Dakota (75)
- State Budget Impact (21)
- Tax Burden (25)
- Taxes (40)
- Tennessee (78)
- Texas (91)
- Utah (80)
- Vermont (70)
- Virginia (79)
- Waivers (21)
- Washington (77)
- West Virginia (68)
- Wisconsin (82)
- Wyoming (84)




You can reach our